Washington, DC, January 4 - The potential sale of advanced F-35A stealth fighter jets to Türkiye remains under active consideration by the United States, even as Israel voices strong opposition to the move. This development marks a significant shift in U.S.-Turkey defense relations, stemming from Türkiye's exclusion from the F-35 program in 2019 following its acquisition of Russian S-400 air defense systems. The U.S. administration, citing security risks to the stealth aircraft's technology, imposed sanctions and removed Ankara from the multinational consortium. However, recent high-level discussions have reopened the possibility of reinstatement, with reports indicating that the U.S. is evaluating pathways forward despite longstanding barriers.
Israel's concerns center on preserving its qualitative military edge in the Middle East, where it currently operates the F-35 as the region's sole user of this fifth-generation fighter. Jerusalem argues that equipping Türkiye with F-35A variants could alter regional air superiority dynamics, particularly amid ongoing tensions over various geopolitical issues. U.S. officials have acknowledged these objections, yet the evaluation process continues, driven by broader NATO alliance priorities and bilateral ties. The F-35 Turkey deal has drawn attention for its implications on Middle East security, with potential deliveries focusing on the conventional takeoff F-35A model suited to Türkiye's air force needs.
Key to any progress is resolving the S-400 impasse, as U.S. law prohibits Türkiye's participation in the F-35 program while possessing the Russian system. Diplomatic channels report ongoing talks aimed at addressing this, including possibilities of deactivation or divestment. The U.S.-Turkey F-35 discussions underscore Washington's balancing act between allied commitments and regional stability.
Ultimately, congressional approval would be required for any F-35 sale to Türkiye, adding layers of scrutiny. As evaluations proceed, the outcome could reshape NATO's southeastern flank and influence future arms transfers in the region, highlighting the complex interplay of defense cooperation and strategic rivalries.
