Seattle, August 28 - The International Air Transport Association (IATA), representing approximately 350 airlines worldwide, has formally proposed increasing the international pilot retirement age from 65 to 67 for pilots operating multi-pilot commercial flights. This request, directed to the United Nations’ International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), comes in response to a growing global demand for air travel that is outpacing the supply of qualified pilots. The proposal, outlined in a working paper titled “Proposal to Raise the Multi-Pilot Commercial Air Transport Pilot Age Limit to 67 Years,” argues that extending the retirement age is a pragmatic solution to address the global pilot shortage. IATA emphasizes that this change aligns with 15 of the 17 United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, particularly through supporting the Next Generation of Aviation Professionals program, which aims to ensure a steady supply of skilled aviators. The ICAO is set to review this proposal at its 42nd General Assembly, scheduled for September 23 to October 3, 2025, in Montreal, Canada. The proposed increase is framed as a cautious step, with IATA stipulating that flights must still include at least one pilot under 65 to maintain safety standards.
.gif)
The aviation industry is grappling with a significant imbalance between the rising demand for air travel and the availability of trained pilots. Forecasts from manufacturers like Airbus and Boeing project a need for over 600,000 new commercial pilots in the next two decades to meet global demand. IATA’s proposal draws on the precedent set in 2006, when ICAO raised the pilot retirement age from 60 to 65 without compromising safety. The organization argues that a further increase to 67 is a reasonable extension, supported by improved life expectancy and rigorous medical assessments that ensure pilots remain fit to fly. In countries like Canada, Australia, and New Zealand, where no upper age limit exists for pilots, there has been no evidence of increased safety risks. IATA also notes that air traffic controllers, who face similar functional and medical standards but have no age restrictions, show no elevated risk of on-duty medical incidents, further supporting their case. The proposal includes a call for standardized medical risk assessments and enhanced oversight systems to monitor pilot health, ensuring that any age increase does not jeopardize flight safety.
Opposition to the proposal, particularly from major U.S. pilot unions, centers on safety and operational concerns. The Allied Pilots Association (APA) argues that insufficient data exists to fully understand the risks of allowing pilots to fly commercially beyond 65, with spokesperson Dennis Tajer emphasizing that safety cannot be compromised without thorough research. The Air Line Pilots Association (ALPA) has similarly expressed concerns, noting that raising the retirement age could disrupt airline operations, complicate training schedules, and necessitate renegotiating pilot contracts. These unions also highlight potential challenges for younger pilots, as extending the retirement age could delay career progression and limit opportunities for promotions. In 2023, a U.S. congressional effort to raise the domestic pilot retirement age to 67 was rejected, reflecting the contentious nature of the issue. The FAA has also urged caution, with Administrator Michael Whitaker recommending comprehensive safety studies before any changes are implemented. These concerns underscore the delicate balance between addressing pilot shortages and maintaining the aviation industry’s stringent safety standards.
The push to raise the pilot retirement age also has geopolitical implications, as highlighted by a bipartisan group of U.S. senators, including John Thune, Marsha Blackburn, and Mark Kelly. In a letter to Secretary of State Marco Rubio, they urged the Trump administration to support the ICAO proposal, arguing that it would preserve experienced pilots and strengthen U.S. leadership in global aviation policy. They warned that failing to act could allow countries like China to gain influence over ICAO standards. Meanwhile, India, one of the fastest-growing aviation markets, has raised related concerns in a separate ICAO working paper, addressing the poaching of its pilots by foreign carriers. India’s submission calls for a code of conduct to regulate the movement of aviation personnel between countries, highlighting the global nature of the pilot shortage crisis. As the ICAO assembly approaches, the debate over the retirement age increase will likely intensify, weighing the benefits of retaining experienced pilots against the need for robust safety data and equitable career opportunities for the next generation of aviators.