The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has issued a new Airworthiness Directive (AD) for Rolls-Royce Trent XWB-97 engines, affecting the Airbus A350-1000 models. This directive, cataloged as AD 2024-25-10, stems from concerns over potential safety hazards identified within the engine's fuel system, specifically damage to the main fuel hose assembly in the fuel manifold. This issue came to light after reports of in-flight engine shutdowns, which could lead to more severe complications like temporary engine fires and heat damage to engine components. The Trent XWB-97, designed specifically for the long-haul capabilities of the Airbus A350-1000 and A350F aircraft, is known for its high thrust and efficiency, making it a popular choice for international airlines. However, the recent findings have necessitated immediate action to ensure continued safety in flight operations. The AD, effective from February 18, 2025, mandates that operators comply with specific measures to mitigate the risks associated with this flaw.
.gif)
According to the FAA, the primary concern revolves around the degradation of the main fuel hose within the fuel manifold. If not addressed, this could result in an in-flight engine shutdown, which under certain conditions, might escalate into a more severe engine fire, potentially causing structural damage to the aircraft. To counteract this risk, the AD outlines mandatory inspections and corrective actions for all affected Trent XWB-97 engines, which are crucial for maintaining airworthiness and ensuring passenger safety. Operators are required to perform visual and dimensional inspections of the fuel manifold's main fuel hoses. These inspections aim to detect any signs of wear or damage that could compromise the integrity of the fuel system. Depending on the findings, operators might need to replace the hoses or undertake other corrective measures outlined in Rolls-Royce Non-Modification Service Bulletin (NMSB) Trent XWB 72-AL165.
The issuance of this AD follows a pattern seen with previous directives for Rolls-Royce engines, where safety is prioritized through preventive and corrective measures. This recent directive also aligns with a similar Airworthiness Directive issued by the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) in response to a serious incident involving a Cathay Pacific flight from Hong Kong. The EASA's AD focused on inspecting flexible fuel hose connections, which parallels the FAA's directive, indicating a coordinated international response to ensure the safety of the Trent XWB engines. The implications of this AD are significant for airlines operating the A350-1000. Compliance with the directive will involve scheduling downtime for inspections, potentially impacting flight schedules and operational costs. Airlines like Qatar Airways, British Airways, and Cathay Pacific, which have substantial fleets of these aircraft, will need to manage these logistics carefully. Moreover, this directive underscores the importance of rigorous maintenance schedules and adherence to manufacturer guidelines to avoid safety incidents.
This AD is not just about addressing an immediate problem but also about reinforcing the aviation industry's commitment to safety. It prompts a broader discussion on the continuous monitoring and updating of aircraft components to adapt to new findings and technological advancements. As the aviation sector continues to grow, such directives play a pivotal role in maintaining public trust in air travel safety and efficiency. In conclusion, the FAA's Airworthiness Directive for the Rolls-Royce Trent XWB-97 engines highlights the ongoing challenges and responsibilities in aircraft maintenance and safety. It serves as a reminder of the vigilance required by all stakeholders in the aviation industry to ensure that the skies remain safe for everyone.