In a significant statement made during the Aero India 2025 show in Bengaluru, Boeing, the American aerospace giant, has signaled its reluctance to establish a final civil aircraft assembly line in India without a substantial increase in aircraft orders from the region. This announcement has tempered the Indian government's aspirations to boost local manufacturing of commercial jets, highlighting a business model where demand must significantly outweigh current market consumption for such an investment to be viable. Boeing's President for India and South Asia, Salil Gupte, elucidated that the business case for setting up a final assembly line in any region demands a market size far larger than what India currently presents. He stressed that the volume of airplanes required to justify the creation of an assembly line in India greatly exceeds the number of aircraft currently being ordered by Indian airlines. With the Indian market projected to grow but not at the pace necessary for immediate investment in a final assembly line, Boeing appears to be taking a wait-and-see approach.
.gif)
India's aviation sector has been on an upward trajectory, with airlines like Air India and IndiGo placing orders for about 1,800 aircraft from global manufacturers. These orders are expected to see the delivery of 130 jets in the current year alone, according to data from UK-based Cirium Ascend. Despite this growth, Boeing's strategic vision for India involves a longer-term commitment to building capabilities step-by-step rather than a full-fledged manufacturing facility. Gupte noted that while Boeing has a "strong commitment" to the Indian aerospace sector, the final assembly of commercial airplanes is less than 10% of the total value proposition of an aircraft. The "real money," he explains, lies in the extensive processes and supply chain developments leading up to the assembly. Boeing currently sources products and services worth $1.25 billion annually from India, engaging with over 300 suppliers, which underscores the company's existing investment in the country's aerospace ecosystem.
Moreover, the company has been involved in joint ventures, such as with the Tata Group, producing components like AH-64 Apache helicopter fuselages and 737 aircraft vertical fin structures for global customers. This existing collaboration indicates Boeing's interest in bolstering India's manufacturing capabilities, albeit in a phased manner. The Indian government has been pushing for international manufacturers to invest in domestic assembly lines to capitalize on the growing demand for air travel within the country and to reduce import dependency. Prime Minister Narendra Modi's vision of seeing aircraft designed and manufactured in India has been a significant driver behind these aspirations. However, Boeing's stance suggests that while the potential is acknowledged, the practical economics of setting up such an operation do not yet align with market realities.
The conversation around increasing orders also touches on the need for government incentives to lower capital costs for suppliers in India, which Gupte mentions as essential for expanding the aerospace supply chain. This would not only encourage Boeing to reconsider its strategy but also foster a more robust manufacturing environment in India. In conclusion, Boeing's cautious approach to setting up an assembly line in India underscores the need for a more substantial market demand before such a significant investment can be justified. The company's focus on gradual capability building reflects a pragmatic strategy in one of the world's fastest-growing aviation markets, even as it keeps an eye on the long-term potential of manufacturing in India.