Kelly Ortberg’s tenure as Boeing’s CEO, which began in August 2024, has ushered in a noticeable shift in the company’s direction, with a renewed emphasis on engineering rigor and operational discipline. Ortberg, a mechanical engineer by training and a veteran of the aerospace industry from his time at Rockwell Collins, arrived at Boeing during a period of intense scrutiny and financial strain. His leadership comes on the heels of high-profile incidents, including the January 2024 Alaska Airlines 737 MAX 9 door plug blowout, which exposed persistent quality control issues and eroded trust in the company. Unlike his predecessor Dave Calhoun, whose background was rooted in finance and management, Ortberg brings a technical mindset that appears to be steering Boeing back toward its engineering roots, a move that could redefine its trajectory in the competitive aerospace landscape.
.gif)
Since taking the helm, Ortberg has made it clear that restoring Boeing’s reputation hinges on addressing its manufacturing and safety challenges head-on. The 737 MAX program, long a cornerstone of Boeing’s commercial portfolio, has been plagued by setbacks, from the grounding of the fleet after two fatal crashes in 2018 and 2019 to the more recent production halts mandated by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). Ortberg has prioritized stabilizing production, emphasizing quality over speed. This approach marks a departure from the previous leadership’s focus on meeting delivery timelines, which critics argue contributed to lapses in oversight. His insistence on spending time on factory floors and in engineering labs reflects a hands-on philosophy aimed at rebuilding a culture of precision and accountability. Financially, Boeing has been bleeding cash—over $4 billion per quarter—exacerbated by a seven-week machinists’ strike in 2024 and regulatory constraints on production rates. Ortberg has responded with a pragmatic overhaul, announcing a 10% workforce reduction, approximately 17,000 jobs, to align staffing with current realities.
While controversial, this decision underscores his focus on streamlining operations to support core engineering efforts rather than sustaining an overstretched workforce. Simultaneously, he has signaled a portfolio review, suggesting that non-core assets could be divested to concentrate resources on commercial airplanes and defense systems. This strategic pruning aims to sharpen Boeing’s competitive edge against rivals like Airbus, which has capitalized on Boeing’s struggles to widen its market lead. Ortberg’s engineering focus is also evident in his approach to technical challenges. For instance, the 777X program, delayed by issues like the thrust link failure, has resumed flight testing under his watch, with Ortberg expressing confidence in the fixes being implemented. Similarly, he has prioritized resolving the engine anti-ice system flaw in the 737 MAX 7 and 10 variants, a prerequisite for FAA certification. These efforts highlight a commitment to getting the details right, a stark contrast to the broader, less technical oversight of the Calhoun era. Ortberg has also curtailed executive perks, such as private jet usage, redirecting resources to operational priorities—a symbolic and practical nod to fiscal discipline that supports engineering innovation.
The broader implications of Ortberg’s shift are still unfolding. Boeing’s engineering union, the Society of Professional Engineering Employees in Aerospace, has raised concerns about work being outsourced to non-union locations, suggesting tension between cost-cutting and maintaining in-house expertise. Yet, Ortberg’s vision extends beyond immediate fixes. He has evoked the collaborative “Working Together” ethos of the 1990s, when Boeing successfully developed the 777 under Alan Mulally, as a blueprint for cultural renewal. Whether this engineering-driven approach can restore Boeing’s stature as an aerospace leader remains uncertain, but early signs suggest a pivot toward technical excellence over financial expediency. As Ortberg navigates regulatory pressures, a looming Senate testimony in April 2025, and competition from Airbus, his focus on engineering could be the fulcrum on which Boeing’s recovery turns.